----- Original Message ----
From: Bean <address@hidden>
To: The development of GRUB 2 <address@hidden>
Sent: Monday, 1 September, 2008 3:46:32 PM
Subject: Re: Windows,grub and grub2
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Viswesh S <
address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
Hi,
Do you mean the result is still the same after you apply my patch ? I
check the source code of grub legacy, the handling should be exactly
the same. Are you using the official branch grub 0.96, or some package
with modification ?
You can also check memory at 0x7be, this should be the partition table
in mbr, %esi would point to the boot partition.
--
Bean
Hi,
The result is still the same after the patch.
I am using the official grub2 released package 1.96.
In that the chainloader patch wasnt there.Hence applied that according to your inputs as in the mail.
I checked the memory at 0x7be, which is the same as 0x1be in the mbr.
The first partition was already active also.
Also as I mentioned,what about the code for the int 13 extension and and their functionalities for 2,41,42.
Is there any change there.
Otherwise I am not really sure, why grub is able to boot,but grub2 not.