[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PPC64
From: |
Hollis Blanchard |
Subject: |
Re: PPC64 |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Nov 2008 10:12:18 -0600 |
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 14:05 -0200, Manoel wrote:
> I was able to solve this thanks to Hollis and Segher.
>
> What was need was a flag to gcc ( -mlong-call) so that gcc puts indirect
> branches instead of direct branches when needed to prevent the 32mb
> limitation (as stated at gcc manpages).
>
> My doubt is where is the best place to put this flag so that it will be
> passed to all gcc calls by default?
You don't want it on all gcc calls; you only want it when building the
modules.
--
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center
- Re: PPC64, Manoel, 2008/11/04
- Re: PPC64,
Hollis Blanchard <=
- PPC64 mlongcall gcc flag, Manoel, 2008/11/04
- Re: PPC64 mlongcall gcc flag, Manoel, 2008/11/04
- Re: PPC64 mlongcall gcc flag, Robert Millan, 2008/11/04
- Re: PPC64 mlongcall gcc flag, Pavel Roskin, 2008/11/04
- Re: PPC64 mlongcall gcc flag, Robert Millan, 2008/11/05
- Re: PPC64 mlongcall gcc flag, Pavel Roskin, 2008/11/05
- Re: PPC64 mlongcall gcc flag, Hollis Blanchard, 2008/11/05
- Re: PPC64 mlongcall gcc flag, Manoel, 2008/11/05
- Re: PPC64 mlongcall gcc flag, Robert Millan, 2008/11/06
- Re: PPC64 mlongcall gcc flag, Manoel, 2008/11/06