Re: __FILE__ (Re: [PATCH] framework for building modules externally)

[Christian Franke]

Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 10:10:56PM +0100, Christian Franke wrote:
>   
> > See attached patch for a possible fix: Each module using grub_dprintf 
> > (here disk.c) may specify its name in 'this_file'. When all modules are 
> > changed, the '#define this_file' and all #undefs can be removed.
> >     
>
> This adds redundancy which later makes it more work to move code around and
> rename files, etc.  Why not make it part of the build system?  I.e. to build
> foo.c, you need gcc -Dfile=foo.c foo.c ?
>
>   

Rarely used, but makes sense.

Even leaving the source as is and using 'gcc -D__FILE__=foo.c ...' would 
work, but then gcc emits a warning.


> But then again, since gcc is free software perhaps it'd make more sense to
> add new candy there? (e.g. __RELATIVE_FILE__ or so).
>
>   
... and/or a new option '-ffile_var_relative_to=PREFIX' which removes 
PREFIX (e.g. "$srcdir/") from __FILE__ expansions. Then such a fix could 
easily be added also to other existing projects, without any sourcecode 
changes.

Christian