[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM
From: |
Isaac Dupree |
Subject: |
Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:03:28 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.27-11-generic; KDE/4.1.3; x86_64; ; ) |
Alex Besogonov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Isaac Dupree
>
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Alex Besogonov wrote:
> > But guess what? While your system is running, they can take out your RAM
> > and read it (disk-encryption key and all) before the RAM forgets its
> > contents, see e.g. http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=900
>
> I know. But there's no way to guard against this attack, so there's no
> sense fretting over it for now.
well, it's relatively straightforward for an attacker who knows what they're
doing, so perhaps you should assume that *privacy* is at least partly
compromised.
but the most that attack can achieve is observing? Can that attack make it so
that, when the system starts running again, it will be in a compromised state?
- they can steal all crypto identity keys and try to run a completely different
computer with different software there, if not for TPM
- I don't know how the magic of TPM knowing everything about the state of your
computer works, maybe they can modify what's in memory and put it back and
confuse things?
Also why does GRUB need to do any explicit interaction with TPM? (I'm
ignorant and unimportant here, but maybe it will edify people, to have this
conversation.)
-Isaac
Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Robert Millan, 2009/02/21
Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Alex Besogonov, 2009/02/18
Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Alex Besogonov, 2009/02/19
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, phcoder, 2009/02/19
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Alex Besogonov, 2009/02/19
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Jan Alsenz, 2009/02/19
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Alex Besogonov, 2009/02/19
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Jan Alsenz, 2009/02/20
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Alex Besogonov, 2009/02/21
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Robert Millan, 2009/02/27
Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Robert Millan, 2009/02/21