[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GRUB device names wrt. ieee1275
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: GRUB device names wrt. ieee1275 |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:22:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 01:41:52AM +0100, phcoder wrote:
> I don't see why
> sth like
> (/address@hidden,600000/address@hidden/address@hidden/address@hidden/address@hidden/address@hidden,1)
> is a problem.
FWIW, I like this much better than replacing our comma separator with
something else, thereby making GRUB inconsistent among platforms.
I'll see if I can read the whole thread and think if there can be other
solutions, but can't do it today. Maybe wednesday or next weekend.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
- Re: GRUB device names wrt. ieee1275, (continued)
- Re: GRUB device names wrt. ieee1275, David Miller, 2009/03/15
- Re: GRUB device names wrt. ieee1275, Robert Millan, 2009/03/18
- Re: GRUB device names wrt. ieee1275, David Miller, 2009/03/18
- Re: GRUB device names wrt. ieee1275, David Miller, 2009/03/18
- Re: GRUB device names wrt. ieee1275, phcoder, 2009/03/21
- Re: GRUB device names wrt. ieee1275, phcoder, 2009/03/21
- Re: GRUB device names wrt. ieee1275, David Miller, 2009/03/21
- Re: GRUB device names wrt. ieee1275, David Miller, 2009/03/21
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: GRUB device names wrt. ieee1275, phcoder, 2009/03/22
- Re: GRUB device names wrt. ieee1275, David Miller, 2009/03/22
- Re: GRUB device names wrt. ieee1275,
Robert Millan <=
- Re: GRUB device names wrt. ieee1275, David Miller, 2009/03/23