[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] save_env variable_name=value
From: |
Pavel Roskin |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] save_env variable_name=value |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Sep 2009 01:14:06 -0400 |
On Sat, 2009-09-12 at 09:54 -0500, address@hidden wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Pavel Roskin <address@hidden> wrote:
> > I don't see how grub-mkconfig could compensate for a missing feature in
> > save_env. Perhaps I'm missing the context here.
>
> AFAICT, it's grub.cfg that has to work around using two commands instead of
> one.
Yes, if we want to keep backward compatibility with older modules.
> Therefore grub-mkconfig has to generate a longer grub.cfg (not sure
> how this makes grub-mkconfig uglier), but that's an incomplete
> assessment. There's also a different burden placed on user-edited
> configs and usage of the grub console, correct?
Correct.
> I don't think that the suggestion was meant to save a few bytes in
> grub-mkconfig. I think it was suggesting a nicer interface for users
> working in the console.
Yes. Also, grub-mkconfig could use it once we decide to break backward
compatibility with the last version that didn't support save_env with a
name.
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
- [PATCH] save_env variable_name=value, Colin Watson, 2009/09/02
- Re: [PATCH] save_env variable_name=value, Robert Millan, 2009/09/03
- Re: [PATCH] save_env variable_name=value, Colin Watson, 2009/09/03
- Re: [PATCH] save_env variable_name=value, Robert Millan, 2009/09/03
- Re: [PATCH] save_env variable_name=value, Pavel Roskin, 2009/09/11
- Re: [PATCH] save_env variable_name=value, Robert Millan, 2009/09/12
- Re: [PATCH] save_env variable_name=value, Colin Watson, 2009/09/12
- Re: [PATCH] save_env variable_name=value, address@hidden, 2009/09/12
- Re: [PATCH] save_env variable_name=value,
Pavel Roskin <=