[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 16-bit bootloader support?
From: |
Bogdan |
Subject: |
Re: 16-bit bootloader support? |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Oct 2009 06:37:45 -0700 (PDT) |
Well yes, that's exactly what this discussion was about, wasn't it? :)
Cheers,
Bogdan
----- Original Message ----
From: James Courtier-Dutton <address@hidden>
To: The development of GRUB 2 <address@hidden>
Sent: Fri, October 9, 2009 4:06:45 PM
Subject: Re: 16-bit bootloader support?
2009/10/7 Gabe Black <address@hidden>:
>
> So I have a real-time OS named Pharlap that has a 16-bit bootloader that
> ends up switching to 32-bit protected mode and loads the OS. I think it
> relies on the first sector of the partition being loaded and execution
> simply started - but in real-mode.
>
> Is there any way to have grub do this (legacy or grub2)? I tried
> chainloading, but I think that may be loading it in 32-bit mode. Any
> pointers on what code I would have to modify to create that option for grub?
>
> Any help is appreciated.
>
I don't think grub can work on any CPU below a 80386.
It probably will no work on 8086, 80186 and 80286.
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
- 16-bit bootloader support?, Gabe Black, 2009/10/07
- Fw: 16-bit bootloader support?, Bogdan, 2009/10/08
- Re: Fw: 16-bit bootloader support?, Seth Goldberg, 2009/10/08
- Re: Fw: 16-bit bootloader support?, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2009/10/08
- Re: Fw: 16-bit bootloader support?, Bogdan, 2009/10/08
- Re: Fw: 16-bit bootloader support?, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2009/10/08
- Re: Fw: 16-bit bootloader support?, Bogdan, 2009/10/08
- Re: Fw: 16-bit bootloader support?, Robert Millan, 2009/10/09
- Re: Fw: 16-bit bootloader support?, Bogdan, 2009/10/09