[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Migrations to xorriso
From: |
Colin Watson |
Subject: |
Re: Migrations to xorriso |
Date: |
Wed, 19 May 2010 13:13:36 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 02:01:50PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> would the following changes be acceptable for
> grub-mkrescue ?
>
> - Option --xorriso=PROGFILE allows to use a
> particular binary as xorriso program.
> This will avoid the need to install xorriso.
> One can just unpack and build it in some
> directory and use .../xorriso/xorriso
> as binary.
This is in line with other options already in GRUB utility scripts, so
seems sensible.
> - Option --diet saves about 400 kB of image
> size without losing much benefit.
I don't have much of an opinion on this; but if it doesn't lose much,
why would it not be the default? Or, put another way, why would
somebody want to turn this option off?
> + "${xorriso}" -report_about HINT -as mkisofs -graft-points -no-pad
> ${grub_mkisofs_arguments} --protective-msdos-label -r ${iso9660_dir}
> ${source} | cat >"${output_image}"
Useless use of cat.
--
Colin Watson address@hidden
Re: Migrations to xorriso, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2010/05/19
Re: Migrations to xorriso, Thomas Schmitt, 2010/05/20