[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: USB3 3TB HDD boot
From: |
Chris Murphy |
Subject: |
Re: USB3 3TB HDD boot |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:36:31 -0600 |
On Mar 18, 2013, at 3:46 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
> BIOS interfaces support up-to 64-bit LBA adressing so >2T is just issue
> of fixing bugs in BIOS.
Aha. OK good to know.
> On, the other hand problem with 4Kn is deeper as
> it doesn't seem to even be any implicit agreement of how such disks
> should be handled for booting. Nor does it seem any impmentation on
> either bootloader or BIOS side.
This is concerning. So at the moment the 4Kn drives are effectively data only,
non-bootable. Is it the same situation for UEFI and BIOS? It seems the 4Kn
release is premature. The 512e method has few downsides for any recent
partitioning tool, which ensures alignment, and they are also bootable without
concerns. I'm unaware of a downside.
Chris Murphy
- Re: USB3 3TB HDD boot, (continued)
- Re: USB3 3TB HDD boot, Lennart Sorensen, 2013/03/15
- Re: USB3 3TB HDD boot, Chris Murphy, 2013/03/15
- Re: USB3 3TB HDD boot, Bruce Dubbs, 2013/03/15
- Re: USB3 3TB HDD boot, Lennart Sorensen, 2013/03/15
- Re: USB3 3TB HDD boot, Chris Murphy, 2013/03/15
- Re: USB3 3TB HDD boot, Bob Lemar, 2013/03/18
- Re: USB3 3TB HDD boot, Chris Murphy, 2013/03/18
- Re: USB3 3TB HDD boot, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2013/03/18
- Re: USB3 3TB HDD boot, Chris Murphy, 2013/03/18
- Re: USB3 3TB HDD boot, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2013/03/18
- Re: USB3 3TB HDD boot,
Chris Murphy <=
- RE: USB3 3TB HDD boot, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage), 2013/03/18
- Re: USB3 3TB HDD boot, Chris Murphy, 2013/03/18
- Re: USB3 3TB HDD boot, Phillip Susi, 2013/03/20
Re: USB3 3TB HDD boot, Chris Murphy, 2013/03/04