[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 05/18] efi: split efi_enabled to efi_platform and efi_loader
From: |
Roy Franz |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 05/18] efi: split efi_enabled to efi_platform and efi_loader |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Mar 2015 10:43:44 -0800 |
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Stefano Stabellini
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Daniel Kiper wrote:
>> We need more fine grained knowledge about EFI environment and check
>> for EFI platform and EFI loader separately to properly support
>> multiboot2 protocol. In general Xen loaded by this protocol uses
>> memory mappings and loaded modules in simliar way to Xen loaded
>> by multiboot (v1) protocol. Hence, split efi_enabled to efi_platform
>> and efi_loader.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Kiper <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> xen/arch/x86/dmi_scan.c | 4 ++--
>> xen/arch/x86/domain_page.c | 2 +-
>> xen/arch/x86/efi/stub.c | 5 +++--
>> xen/arch/x86/mpparse.c | 4 ++--
>> xen/arch/x86/setup.c | 8 ++++----
>> xen/arch/x86/time.c | 2 +-
>> xen/common/efi/boot.c | 5 +++++
>> xen/common/efi/runtime.c | 5 +++--
>> xen/drivers/acpi/osl.c | 2 +-
>> xen/include/xen/efi.h | 6 +++++-
>> 10 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/dmi_scan.c b/xen/arch/x86/dmi_scan.c
>> index 500133a..63b976c 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/dmi_scan.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/dmi_scan.c
>> @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ int __init dmi_get_table(u32 *base, u32 *len)
>> struct dmi_eps eps;
>> char __iomem *p, *q;
>>
>> - if (efi_enabled) {
>> + if (efi_platform) {
>> if (!efi_dmi_size)
>> return -1;
>> *base = efi_dmi_address;
>> @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ static void __init dmi_decode(struct dmi_header *dm)
>>
>> void __init dmi_scan_machine(void)
>> {
>> - if ((!efi_enabled ? dmi_iterate(dmi_decode) :
>> + if ((!efi_platform ? dmi_iterate(dmi_decode) :
>> dmi_efi_iterate(dmi_decode)) == 0)
>> dmi_check_system(dmi_blacklist);
>> else
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/domain_page.c b/xen/arch/x86/domain_page.c
>> index 158a164..5d4564c 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain_page.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain_page.c
>> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static inline struct vcpu *mapcache_current_vcpu(void)
>> sync_local_execstate();
>> /* We must now be running on the idle page table. */
>> ASSERT((cr3 = read_cr3()) == __pa(idle_pg_table) ||
>> - (efi_enabled && cr3 == efi_rs_page_table()));
>> + (efi_platform && cr3 == efi_rs_page_table()));
>> }
>>
>> return v;
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/efi/stub.c b/xen/arch/x86/efi/stub.c
>> index b8f49f8..5060e6f 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/efi/stub.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/efi/stub.c
>> @@ -3,8 +3,9 @@
>> #include <xen/init.h>
>> #include <xen/lib.h>
>>
>> -#ifndef efi_enabled
>> -const bool_t efi_enabled = 0;
>> +#ifndef efi_platform
>> +bool_t efi_platform = 0;
>> +bool_t efi_loader = 0;
>> #endif
>>
>> void __init efi_init_memory(void) { }
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mpparse.c b/xen/arch/x86/mpparse.c
>> index a38e016..c4e3041 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mpparse.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mpparse.c
>> @@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ static inline void __init
>> construct_default_ISA_mptable(int mpc_default_type)
>>
>> static __init void efi_unmap_mpf(void)
>> {
>> - if (efi_enabled)
>> + if (efi_platform)
>> __set_fixmap(FIX_EFI_MPF, 0, 0);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -698,7 +698,7 @@ void __init find_smp_config (void)
>> {
>> unsigned int address;
>>
>> - if (efi_enabled) {
>> + if (efi_platform) {
>> efi_check_config();
>> return;
>> }
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/setup.c b/xen/arch/x86/setup.c
>> index c27c49c..711fdb0 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/setup.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/setup.c
>> @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static void __init parse_video_info(void)
>> struct boot_video_info *bvi = &bootsym(boot_vid_info);
>>
>> /* The EFI loader fills vga_console_info directly. */
>> - if ( efi_enabled )
>> + if ( efi_platform )
>> return;
>>
>> if ( (bvi->orig_video_isVGA == 1) && (bvi->orig_video_mode == 3) )
>> @@ -663,7 +663,7 @@ void __init noreturn __start_xen(unsigned long mbi_p)
>> if ( ((unsigned long)cpu0_stack & (STACK_SIZE-1)) != 0 )
>> panic("Misaligned CPU0 stack.");
>>
>> - if ( efi_enabled )
>> + if ( efi_loader )
>> {
>> set_pdx_range(xen_phys_start >> PAGE_SHIFT,
>> (xen_phys_start + BOOTSTRAP_MAP_BASE) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>> @@ -774,7 +774,7 @@ void __init noreturn __start_xen(unsigned long mbi_p)
>> * we can relocate the dom0 kernel and other multiboot modules. Also, on
>> * x86/64, we relocate Xen to higher memory.
>> */
>> - for ( i = 0; !efi_enabled && i < mbi->mods_count; i++ )
>> + for ( i = 0; !efi_loader && i < mbi->mods_count; i++ )
>> {
>> if ( mod[i].mod_start & (PAGE_SIZE - 1) )
>> panic("Bootloader didn't honor module alignment request.");
>> @@ -962,7 +962,7 @@ void __init noreturn __start_xen(unsigned long mbi_p)
>>
>> if ( !xen_phys_start )
>> panic("Not enough memory to relocate Xen.");
>> - reserve_e820_ram(&boot_e820, efi_enabled ? mbi->mem_upper :
>> __pa(&_start),
>> + reserve_e820_ram(&boot_e820, efi_loader ? mbi->mem_upper :
>> __pa(&_start),
>> __pa(&_end));
>>
>> /* Late kexec reservation (dynamic start address). */
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/time.c b/xen/arch/x86/time.c
>> index 74c01e3..cdd17cb 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/time.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/time.c
>> @@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ static unsigned long get_cmos_time(void)
>> static bool_t __read_mostly cmos_rtc_probe;
>> boolean_param("cmos-rtc-probe", cmos_rtc_probe);
>>
>> - if ( efi_enabled )
>> + if ( efi_platform )
>> {
>> res = efi_get_time();
>> if ( res )
>> diff --git a/xen/common/efi/boot.c b/xen/common/efi/boot.c
>> index ac6881e..8aafcfd 100644
>> --- a/xen/common/efi/boot.c
>> +++ b/xen/common/efi/boot.c
>> @@ -708,6 +708,11 @@ efi_start(EFI_HANDLE ImageHandle, EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE
>> *SystemTable)
>> char *option_str;
>> bool_t use_cfg_file;
>>
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_ARM /* TODO - disabled until implemented on ARM */
>> + efi_platform = 1;
>> + efi_loader = 1;
>> +#endif
>
> What exactly needs to be implemented on ARM? I thought that EFI ARM
> support for Xen is pretty much complete.
>
EFI runtime services support has not been implemented for ARM.
I'll have to look to see how efi_platform and efi_loader relate to
that, I don't know off hand.
>
>> efi_ih = ImageHandle;
>> efi_bs = SystemTable->BootServices;
>> efi_rs = SystemTable->RuntimeServices;
>> diff --git a/xen/common/efi/runtime.c b/xen/common/efi/runtime.c
>> index c840e08..b229c69 100644
>> --- a/xen/common/efi/runtime.c
>> +++ b/xen/common/efi/runtime.c
>> @@ -11,13 +11,14 @@ DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(CHAR16);
>> #ifndef COMPAT
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM /* Disabled until runtime services implemented */
>> -const bool_t efi_enabled = 0;
>> +const bool_t efi_platform = 0;
>> #else
>> # include <asm/i387.h>
>> # include <asm/xstate.h>
>> # include <public/platform.h>
>>
>> -const bool_t efi_enabled = 1;
>> +bool_t efi_platform = 0;
>> +bool_t efi_loader = 0;
>> #endif
>>
>> unsigned int __read_mostly efi_num_ct;
>> diff --git a/xen/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/xen/drivers/acpi/osl.c
>> index 93c983c..b066459 100644
>> --- a/xen/drivers/acpi/osl.c
>> +++ b/xen/drivers/acpi/osl.c
>> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ void __init acpi_os_vprintf(const char *fmt, va_list args)
>>
>> acpi_physical_address __init acpi_os_get_root_pointer(void)
>> {
>> - if (efi_enabled) {
>> + if (efi_platform) {
>> if (efi.acpi20 != EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR)
>> return efi.acpi20;
>> else if (efi.acpi != EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR)
>> diff --git a/xen/include/xen/efi.h b/xen/include/xen/efi.h
>> index 5e02724..54cd390 100644
>> --- a/xen/include/xen/efi.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/xen/efi.h
>> @@ -5,7 +5,11 @@
>> #include <xen/types.h>
>> #endif
>>
>> -extern const bool_t efi_enabled;
>> +/* If true then Xen runs on EFI platform. */
>> +extern bool_t efi_platform;
>> +
>> +/* If true then Xen was loaded by native EFI loader as PE application. */
>> +extern bool_t efi_loader;
>>
>> #define EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR (~0UL)
>>
>> --
>> 1.7.10.4
>>
- Re: [PATCH 05/18] efi: split efi_enabled to efi_platform and efi_loader, Stefano Stabellini, 2015/03/02
- Re: [PATCH 05/18] efi: split efi_enabled to efi_platform and efi_loader,
Roy Franz <=
- Re: [PATCH 05/18] efi: split efi_enabled to efi_platform and efi_loader, Daniel Kiper, 2015/03/27
- Re: [PATCH 05/18] efi: split efi_enabled to efi_platform and efi_loader, Jan Beulich, 2015/03/27
- Re: [PATCH 05/18] efi: split efi_enabled to efi_platform and efi_loader, Andrew Cooper, 2015/03/27
- Re: [PATCH 05/18] efi: split efi_enabled to efi_platform and efi_loader, Jan Beulich, 2015/03/27
- Re: [PATCH 05/18] efi: split efi_enabled to efi_platform and efi_loader, Lennart Sorensen, 2015/03/27
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 05/18] efi: split efi_enabled to efi_platform and efi_loader, Jan Beulich, 2015/03/27
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 05/18] efi: split efi_enabled to efi_platform and efi_loader, Lennart Sorensen, 2015/03/27