[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 3/5] zfs com.delphix:hole_birth feature support
From: |
Andrei Borzenkov |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 3/5] zfs com.delphix:hole_birth feature support |
Date: |
Sun, 3 May 2015 18:15:05 +0300 |
В Sun, 19 Apr 2015 17:57:04 +0300
Toomas Soome <address@hidden> пишет:
>
> > On 19.04.2015, at 17:51, Andrei Borzenkov <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > В Sun, 19 Apr 2015 17:40:16 +0300
> > Toomas Soome <address@hidden> пишет:
> >
> >>
> >> the features in openzfs have different effects, some affect only writes
> >> and are therefore read only compatible - such feature does not need any
> >> changes for reads, this feature is not read only compatible and therefore,
> >> once this feature is enabled, reader code must be changed accordingly.
> >>
> >> so, what they did with hole_birth was they started to insert block birth
> >> timestamps for blocks being released to make it possible to track such
> >> blocks while doing zfs send (when block has birth time, you know its place
> >> on timeline of snapshots). as old reader code was relying on blk_birth ==
> >> 0 to detect an hole, after hole_birth is enabled, hole blk_birth is not 0
> >> any more, so the solution is to check if DVA pointers are zero instead.
> >> and thats exactly what its about.
> >
> > And if hole_birth is *not* enabled on a filesystem we are reading?
> > Should not old code be used in this case?
>
>
> not really, as for holes, DVA pointers are zero anyhow. I guess the original
> implementation used blk_birth to save extra compare - so the new read code is
> compatible with old data.
Committed with explanatory text for non-insiders.
>
>
> >
> >>
> >> reference:
> >> https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/43466aae47bfcd2ad9bf501faec8e75c08095e4f
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 19.04.2015, at 17:11, Andrei Borzenkov <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> В Thu, 16 Apr 2015 08:22:08 +0300
> >>> Toomas Soome <address@hidden> пишет:
> >>>
> >>> This really needs better explanation. Otherwise this looks like either
> >>> old code was broken to start with and it is a bug fix or new code needs
> >>> some conditionals on new feature.
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> grub-core/fs/zfs/zfs.c | 6 ++++--
> >>>> include/grub/zfs/spa.h | 4 +++-
> >>>> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/grub-core/fs/zfs/zfs.c b/grub-core/fs/zfs/zfs.c
> >>>> index 2689986..a731c3d 100644
> >>>> --- a/grub-core/fs/zfs/zfs.c
> >>>> +++ b/grub-core/fs/zfs/zfs.c
> >>>> @@ -280,7 +280,9 @@ grub_crypto_cipher_handle_t (*grub_zfs_load_key)
> >>>> (const struct grub_zfs_key *key
> >>>> */
> >>>> #define MAX_SUPPORTED_FEATURE_STRLEN 50
> >>>> static const char *spa_feature_names[] = {
> >>>> - "org.illumos:lz4_compress",NULL
> >>>> + "org.illumos:lz4_compress",
> >>>> + "com.delphix:hole_birth",
> >>>> + NULL
> >>>> };
> >>>>
> >>>> static int
> >>>> @@ -1751,7 +1753,7 @@ zio_read_gang (blkptr_t * bp, grub_zfs_endian_t
> >>>> endian, dva_t * dva, void *buf,
> >>>>
> >>>> for (i = 0; i < SPA_GBH_NBLKPTRS; i++)
> >>>> {
> >>>> - if (zio_gb->zg_blkptr[i].blk_birth == 0)
> >>>> + if (BP_IS_HOLE(&zio_gb->zg_blkptr[i]))
> >>>> continue;
> >>>>
> >>>> err = zio_read_data (&zio_gb->zg_blkptr[i], endian, buf, data);
> >>>> diff --git a/include/grub/zfs/spa.h b/include/grub/zfs/spa.h
> >>>> index 7edb8ab..df43b6b 100644
> >>>> --- a/include/grub/zfs/spa.h
> >>>> +++ b/include/grub/zfs/spa.h
> >>>> @@ -279,7 +279,9 @@ typedef struct blkptr {
> >>>>
> >>>> #define BP_IDENTITY(bp) (&(bp)->blk_dva[0])
> >>>> #define BP_IS_GANG(bp) DVA_GET_GANG(BP_IDENTITY(bp))
> >>>> -#define BP_IS_HOLE(bp) ((bp)->blk_birth == 0)
> >>>> +#define DVA_IS_EMPTY(dva) ((dva)->dva_word[0] == 0ULL && \
> >>>> + (dva)->dva_word[1] == 0ULL)
> >>>> +#define BP_IS_HOLE(bp) DVA_IS_EMPTY(BP_IDENTITY(bp))
> >>>>
> >>>> /* BP_IS_RAIDZ(bp) assumes no block compression */
> >>>> #define BP_IS_RAIDZ(bp) (DVA_GET_ASIZE(&(bp)->blk_dva[0]) > \
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Grub-devel mailing list
> >>> address@hidden
> >>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Grub-devel mailing list
> >> address@hidden
> >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] zfs com.delphix:hole_birth feature support,
Andrei Borzenkov <=