[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] verifiers: Core TPM support
From: |
Matthew Garrett |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] verifiers: Core TPM support |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Nov 2018 16:44:18 +1100 |
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:59 AM Matthew Garrett <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 1:13 AM Daniel P. Smith <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > It would be great if the TPM commands that are using EFI protocol and
> > exposed to TPM command module be name spaced under efi, e.g.
> > grub_efi_tpm_log_event. As I lay in a TIS implementation, I can mimic a
> > similar set of tis name spaced functions that can be #ifdef/#else (or
> > any other mechanism GRUB maintainer's would prefer) switched between EFI
> > and TIS.
>
> I'm a little confused - if it's #ifdefed then surely there's no
> namespace collision (because only one implementation can be built at
> once)? If the goal is to allow one binary to support multiple
> implementations then that's not impossible, but it's going to require
> runtime registration of TPM callbacks rather than simply namespacing
> stuff.
Hey Daniel - just wanted to check in on this?
- [PATCH V2 1/3] verifiers: Verify commands executed by grub, Matthew Garrett, 2018/11/14
- [PATCH V2 3/3] verifiers: Add TPM documentation, Matthew Garrett, 2018/11/14
- [PATCH V2 2/3] verifiers: Core TPM support, Matthew Garrett, 2018/11/14
- Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] verifiers: Core TPM support, Daniel P. Smith, 2018/11/18
- Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] verifiers: Core TPM support, Matthew Garrett, 2018/11/19
- Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] verifiers: Core TPM support, Daniel Kiper, 2018/11/21
- Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] verifiers: Core TPM support, Matthew Garrett, 2018/11/26
- Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] verifiers: Core TPM support, Daniel Kiper, 2018/11/27
- Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] verifiers: Core TPM support, Matthew Garrett, 2018/11/29
- Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] verifiers: Core TPM support,
Matthew Garrett <=
Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] verifiers: Core TPM support, Daniel Kiper, 2018/11/19