[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] xen: look for Xen notes in section headers too
From: |
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] xen: look for Xen notes in section headers too |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Mar 2019 20:52:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.11.1+94 (9b965fac) (2019-01-05) |
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 01:39:43PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 02:57:08AM +0100, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> > Mirror behaviour of elf loader in libxc: first look for Xen notes in
> > PT_NOTE segment, then in SHT_NOTE section and only then fallback to
> > a section with __xen_guest name.
> > This fixes loading PV kernels that Xen note have outside of PT_NOTE.
> > While this may be result of a buggy linker script, loading such kernel
> > directly works fine, so make it work with grub too.
> > Specifically, this applies to binaries built from Unikraft.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <address@hidden>
>
> I treat this as a fix, so, Reviewed-by: Daniel Kiper <address@hidden>
>
> However, ...
>
> > ---
> > grub-core/loader/i386/xen_fileXX.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/grub-core/loader/i386/xen_fileXX.c
> > b/grub-core/loader/i386/xen_fileXX.c
> > index fb66e66fe..6af6cc0da 100644
> > --- a/grub-core/loader/i386/xen_fileXX.c
> > +++ b/grub-core/loader/i386/xen_fileXX.c
> > @@ -344,6 +344,21 @@ grub_xen_get_infoXX (grub_elf_t elf, struct
> > grub_xen_file_info *xi)
> > s = (Elf_Shdr *) ((char *) s0 + elf->ehdr.ehdrXX.e_shstrndx * shentsize);
> > stroff = s->sh_offset;
> >
> > + for (s = s0; s < (Elf_Shdr *) ((char *) s0 + shnum * shentsize);
> > + s = (Elf_Shdr *) ((char *) s + shentsize))
> > + {
> > + if (s->sh_type == SHT_NOTE) {
>
> Curly bracket is in wrong place...
>
> > + err = parse_note (elf, xi, s->sh_offset, s->sh_size);
> > + if (err)
> > + goto cleanup;
> > + }
>
> ... and this is also in wrong place.
>
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (xi->has_note) {
> > + err = GRUB_ERR_NONE;
> > + goto cleanup;
> > + }
>
> Ditto. Next time please double check that you have correct formatting.
> Now I will fix it before the push. If there are no objections then it
> will happen at the beginning of next week.
Thanks. This code style is very different than any other project I
contribute to...
Anyway, there is a comment earlier in this function:
/* FIXME: check note. */
Is it about this very issue and now can be removed?
--
Best Regards,
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
Invisible Things Lab
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature