[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
CVS gss/doc
From: |
gss-commit |
Subject: |
CVS gss/doc |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Dec 2004 03:14:09 +0100 |
Update of /home/cvs/gss/doc
In directory dopio:/tmp/cvs-serv10845
Modified Files:
gss.texi
Log Message:
Add.
--- /home/cvs/gss/doc/gss.texi 2004/11/19 13:27:26 1.68
+++ /home/cvs/gss/doc/gss.texi 2004/12/16 02:14:09 1.69
@@ -1544,7 +1544,6 @@
@include texi/gss_oid_equal.texi
@include texi/gss_copy_oid.texi
@include texi/gss_duplicate_oid.texi
address@hidden texi/gss_release_oid.texi
@include texi/gss_userok.texi
@deftypefun {int} gss_encapsulate_token (gss_buffer_t @var{input_message},
gss_OID @var{token_oid}, gss_buffer_t @var{output_message})
@@ -1637,6 +1636,13 @@
be allocated by the library, and deallocated (using the utility
functions defined for this purpose) by the library.
+TBA: specification is unclear how memory for OIDs are managed. For
+example, who is responsible for deallocate potentially newly allocated
+OIDs returned as @code{actual_mechs} in @code{gss_acquire_cred}?
+Further, are OIDs deeply copied into OID sets? In other words, if I
+add an OID into an OID set, and modify the original OID, will the OID
+in the OID set be modified too?
+
Another illustrating example is the sample GSS header file given in
the RFC, which contains:
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- CVS gss/doc,
gss-commit <=