[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility.
From: |
Lars J. Aas |
Subject: |
Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility. |
Date: |
Thu, 31 May 2001 14:09:08 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 02:36:36PM +0300, Michael Livshin wrote:
: "Lars J. Aas" <address@hidden> writes:
:
: > BTW, which Automake is being used?
:
: 1.4
:
: you are going to propose using the CVS version, right? ;)
Nope, I use a snapshot from april 1st myself because of a problem with
current CVS and variable references set up by AM_CONDITIONALS in _SOURCES
targets. Gary Vaughan has recently released patchlevel-releases based
on Automake 1.4 though (p2 is current I believe), but I don't know which
bugs they fix.
: (I'm game, actually. I've tried to make our `make distcheck' work,
: and have simply given up on it. I figure the CVS version can't be
: worse.)
Sure can :) CVS Automake has undergone a more-or-less fundamental rewrite.
Not everything they broke in that process has been fixed again.
Lars J
Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility., Marius Vollmer, 2001/05/30
Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility., Marius Vollmer, 2001/05/30
- Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility., Rob Browning, 2001/05/30
- Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility., Martin Grabmueller, 2001/05/31
- Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility., Lars J. Aas, 2001/05/31
- Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility., Michael Livshin, 2001/05/31
- Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility.,
Lars J. Aas <=
- Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility., Michael Livshin, 2001/05/31
- Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility., Lars J. Aas, 2001/05/31
- Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility., Tom Tromey, 2001/05/31
- Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility., Lars J. Aas, 2001/05/31
Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility., Marius Vollmer, 2001/05/31
Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility., Dale P. Smith, 2001/05/31
Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility., Rob Browning, 2001/05/31
Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility., Marius Vollmer, 2001/05/31