[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Weak tables harmful to GC? |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Oct 2017 15:58:26 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) |
Christopher Allan Webber <address@hidden> skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Also, it no longer displays the pathological behavior shown in
>> <https://bugs.gnu.org/28590>.
>>
>> Of course, even better if people could test the two patches and confirm
>> that it works for them.
>>
>> Then if there are no objections I’d like to merge them in ‘stable-2.2’.
>
> Sounds great indeed, but it didn't apply to master or stable-2.2 for me?
Really? The two patches should apply to stable-2.2, though you need to
apply them in the right order (I have it applied over
80696023620eae12f9b2f167aee834f632a32739.)
Ludo’.
- Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Christopher Allan Webber, 2017/10/09
- Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/10/25
- Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/10/25
- Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/10/26
- Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/10/26
- Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/10/26
- Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/10/27
- Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/10/28
- Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/10/30