[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?
From: |
Neil Jerram |
Subject: |
Re: To gh_ or not to gh_? |
Date: |
05 May 2001 11:18:25 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
>>>>> "Sam" == Sam Tregar <address@hidden> writes:
Sam> On Fri, 4 May 2001, Bobby D. Bryant wrote:
>> Let's don't pretend I'm an expert, but FWIW I think you'll find
>> that you can use gh_ for the core of your interface, and then
>> add in some additional scm_ stuff if you want to support more
>> functionality.
Sam> That sounds like a good approach. My only fear about that
Sam> was the ominously empty section of the in-progress docs
Sam> titled something like "Combining gh_ and scm_ calls". It
Sam> made me think maybe that wasn't such a good idea.
I don't think there's anything to worry about here. You can happily
start with GH and then add bits of SCM as you need to.
By the way, if you discover problems with the GH/SCM documentation,
please point them out -- and, even better, send a proposed patch.
This is an area where we are actively trying to stamp out any
remaining problems.
Neil
- To gh_ or not to gh_?, Sam Tregar, 2001/05/04
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Michael Livshin, 2001/05/04
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Bobby D. Bryant, 2001/05/04
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Neil Jerram, 2001/05/05
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/05/05
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Keith Wright, 2001/05/07
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Bill Gribble, 2001/05/07
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Rob Browning, 2001/05/10
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Evan Prodromou, 2001/05/10
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Neil Jerram, 2001/05/11
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Keith Wright, 2001/05/11
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/05/12
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Sam Tregar, 2001/05/10