[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guile-1.5.1 and deprecated ...
From: |
David Pirotte |
Subject: |
Re: guile-1.5.1 and deprecated ... |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Aug 2001 11:46:46 +0200 |
Thomas Wawrzinek wrote:
>
> ...
> Yes, but this would require to know in advance which "protocols" you
> need. This can become very inconvenient in a large application under
> constant development.
from an appl. devel. point of vue, there should be no difference for a
developer between:
1. defining 2 classes in the same module, with one accessor
bearing the same `name' (and exporting it)
and
2. having these 2 classes defined in different modules
with a 3d module using either the first solution either the second, or
both, don't you think?
david
- guile-1.5.1 and deprecated ..., David Pirotte, 2001/08/22
- Re: guile-1.5.1 and deprecated ..., David Pirotte, 2001/08/22
- Re: guile-1.5.1 and deprecated ..., Thomas Wawrzinek, 2001/08/22
- Re: guile-1.5.1 and deprecated ..., David Pirotte, 2001/08/22
- Re: guile-1.5.1 and deprecated ..., Thomas Wawrzinek, 2001/08/22
- Re: guile-1.5.1 and deprecated ..., Rob Browning, 2001/08/22
- Re: guile-1.5.1 and deprecated ..., Marius Vollmer, 2001/08/22
- Re: guile-1.5.1 and deprecated ..., Thomas Wawrzinek, 2001/08/23
- Re: guile-1.5.1 and deprecated ...,
David Pirotte <=
- Re: guile-1.5.1 and deprecated ..., Thomas Wawrzinek, 2001/08/23
- Re: guile-1.5.1 and deprecated ..., Marius Vollmer, 2001/08/23
- Re: guile-1.5.1 and deprecated ..., Rob Browning, 2001/08/29
- Re: guile-1.5.1 and deprecated ..., Dirk Herrmann, 2001/08/30
- Re: guile-1.5.1 and deprecated ..., Michael Livshin, 2001/08/30
- Re: guile-1.5.1 and deprecated ..., Rob Browning, 2001/08/23
- Re: guile-1.5.1 and deprecated ..., Marius Vollmer, 2001/08/23
- Re: guile-1.5.1 and deprecated ..., Rob Browning, 2001/08/24
- Re: guile-1.5.1 and deprecated ..., Thomas Wawrzinek, 2001/08/24
- Re: guile-1.5.1 and deprecated ..., Marius Vollmer, 2001/08/24