[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lost: guile 1.7.0 doesn't look to GUILE_LOAD_PATH ?
From: |
Thomas Wawrzinek |
Subject: |
Re: lost: guile 1.7.0 doesn't look to GUILE_LOAD_PATH ? |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Aug 2001 12:00:00 +0200 (MEST) |
Hi!
address@hidden wrote:
> (load-extension "libpostgres.so" "init_postgres"))
> Should I leave it like this or come back to
> (dynamic-call "init_postgres" (dynamic-link "libpostgres.so"))
The first is a new primitive that acc. to the docs is a shorthand for the
second. So both should be ok, and you can leave it as it is.
[If they are not equivalent, you should maybe report it as a bug.]
Regards,
Thomas
- Re: lost: guile 1.7.0 doesn't look to GUILE_LOAD_PATH ?, (continued)
- Re: lost: guile 1.7.0 doesn't look to GUILE_LOAD_PATH ?, Thomas Wawrzinek, 2001/08/28
- Re: lost: guile 1.7.0 doesn't look to GUILE_LOAD_PATH ?, David Pirotte, 2001/08/28
- Re: lost: guile 1.7.0 doesn't look to GUILE_LOAD_PATH ?, Thomas Wawrzinek, 2001/08/28
- Re: lost: guile 1.7.0 doesn't look to GUILE_LOAD_PATH ?, David Pirotte, 2001/08/28
- Re: lost: guile 1.7.0 doesn't look to GUILE_LOAD_PATH ?, Thomas Wawrzinek, 2001/08/28
- Re: lost: guile 1.7.0 doesn't look to GUILE_LOAD_PATH ?, David Pirotte, 2001/08/28
- Re: lost: guile 1.7.0 doesn't look to GUILE_LOAD_PATH ?, Thomas Wawrzinek, 2001/08/28
- Re: lost: guile 1.7.0 doesn't look to GUILE_LOAD_PATH ?, David Pirotte, 2001/08/28
- Re: lost: guile 1.7.0 doesn't look to GUILE_LOAD_PATH ?, Thomas Wawrzinek, 2001/08/29
- Re: lost: guile 1.7.0 doesn't look to GUILE_LOAD_PATH ?, David Pirotte, 2001/08/29
- Re: lost: guile 1.7.0 doesn't look to GUILE_LOAD_PATH ?,
Thomas Wawrzinek <=
- Re: lost: guile 1.7.0 doesn't look to GUILE_LOAD_PATH ?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/08/29
- Re: lost: guile 1.7.0 doesn't look to GUILE_LOAD_PATH ?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/08/29