[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Modified load-path proposal
From: |
Neil Jerram |
Subject: |
Re: Modified load-path proposal |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 23:29:22 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Greg Troxel <address@hidden> writes:
> That all sounds fine, except that I think (policy!) we should either
> discourage putting stuff under 1.6, or suggest 1.6/site, so that
> guile's own files and other stuff are cleanly separated. I agree that
> mechanism sufficient for various policies is the key point, but think
> we also need to suggest sane behavior to avoid future messes to be
> backwards-compat with.
OK. We can do this by a combination of (i) setting the default so
that 3rd party stuff doesn't go under 1.6, (ii) providing a note on
this point for distributors (new top level DISTRIBUTION file?).
Neil
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, (continued)
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/17
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/10/18
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/19
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Vorfeed Canal, 2005/10/20
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/10/20
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/20
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/10/21
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/17
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Greg Troxel, 2005/10/18
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Vorfeed Canal, 2005/10/18
- Re: Modified load-path proposal,
Neil Jerram <=