[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: statically linking in srfi modules
From: |
Richard Shann |
Subject: |
Re: statically linking in srfi modules |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Feb 2013 17:52:38 +0000 |
I succeeded in linking Denemo with the call
scm_c_register_extension ("libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-3", "scm_init_srfi_1",
scm_init_srfi_1, NULL);
inserted right at the beginning of inner_main (the value passed to
scm_boot_guile, that is), but disappointingly I still get the error
message when srfi-1 tries to dynamically load
<libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-3 The specified module could not be found.>
I found some documentation on this call at
http://mulliken.chem.hope.edu/cgi-bin/info2www.cgi?(guile)Extensions
and it indicated the first argument could be NULL, which would reduce
the danger of a typo in that string causing trouble, but alas with NULL
the same error message occurs. I have checked that scm_init_srfi_1 is a
genuinely non-null pointer, so I don't quite know where to go next. I
have gdb running on the windows box (again, thanks to the mxe
cross-compilation project), but perhaps someone can spare me tracking
through the libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-3.a code?
Richard
On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 12:27 +0100, Andy Wingo wrote:
> On Fri 08 Feb 2013 10:25, Richard Shann <address@hidden>
> writes:
>
> > On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 09:24 +0000, Richard Shann wrote:
> >> Is it possible to statically link in the srfi modules?
> >> (load-extension "libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-3" "scm_init_srfi_1")
> >> fails.
>
> You can link it in I think, but then you will need to call
>
> scm_c_register_extension ("libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-3",
> "scm_init_srfi_1",
> scm_init_srfi_1, NULL)
>
> somewhere in your C code.
>
>
- statically linking in srfi modules, Richard Shann, 2013/02/08
- Re: statically linking in srfi modules, Richard Shann, 2013/02/08
- Re: statically linking in srfi modules, Andy Wingo, 2013/02/08
- Re: statically linking in srfi modules,
Richard Shann <=
- Re: statically linking in srfi modules, Mark H Weaver, 2013/02/08
- Re: statically linking in srfi modules, Mark H Weaver, 2013/02/08
- Re: statically linking in srfi modules, Richard Shann, 2013/02/08
- Re: statically linking in srfi modules, Richard Shann, 2013/02/09
- Re: statically linking in srfi modules, Mark H Weaver, 2013/02/09
- Re: statically linking in srfi modules, Mark H Weaver, 2013/02/09
- Re: statically linking in srfi modules, Richard Shann, 2013/02/09
- Re: statically linking in srfi modules, Mark H Weaver, 2013/02/09
- Re: statically linking in srfi modules, Richard Shann, 2013/02/10
- Re: statically linking in srfi modules, Mark H Weaver, 2013/02/10