[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Core Guile bindings
From: |
Thompson, David |
Subject: |
Re: Core Guile bindings |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:20:30 -0400 |
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Panicz Maciej Godek
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
> 2016-10-12 20:21 GMT+02:00 Thompson, David <address@hidden>:
>>
>>
>> My understanding is that these symbols have been part of the default
>> environment for so long that a lot of code would break if they were
>> removed, so they will be staying for the foreseeable future.
>>
>
> On the other hand, the fix would usually be trivial (just one use-modules
> clause), and besides I don't think that Guile has ever had a tradition of
> worrying too much about backwards compatibility.
The Guile maintainers care very much about backwards compatibility,
from what I've seen over the last few years.
- Dave
- Core Guile bindings, Panicz Maciej Godek, 2016/10/12
- Re: Core Guile bindings, Thompson, David, 2016/10/12
- Re: Core Guile bindings, Panicz Maciej Godek, 2016/10/12
- Re: Core Guile bindings,
Thompson, David <=
- Re: Core Guile bindings, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/10/13
- Re: Core Guile bindings, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2016/10/13
- Re: Core Guile bindings, Panicz Maciej Godek, 2016/10/13
- Re: Core Guile bindings, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2016/10/14
- Re: Core Guile bindings, Robin Templeton, 2016/10/14