Re: name an array function

[Panicz Maciej Godek]

2016-11-21 11:32 GMT+01:00 Daniel Llorens <address@hidden>:

>
> Hello,
>
> version 2.2 of Guile will (I hope) include rank-polymorphic versions of
> array-ref, array-set! and array-for-each. What this means is that instead
> of requiring as many indices as the rank of the array, with these functions
> you can give fewer indices and get a subarray (a ‘prefix slice’). If you
> give all the indices, they behave just as the current versions.
>
> [...]

>
> What do *you* think should be the names of these functions?
>

As far as accessors are concerned, I'm not sure whether they actaully need
names. Maybe it would be better to make them applicable, and produce
"procedures with setters"?