[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A value for "nothing"
|
From: |
HiPhish |
|
Subject: |
Re: A value for "nothing" |
|
Date: |
Sat, 15 Sep 2018 16:50:23 +0200 |
Not a fan of either, "nada" is not English, and "nix" is a slang term,
unlikely to be known to foreign speakers (I didn't know about it myself). How
about "nihil", it's an inter-lingual term and close to "nil" in sound.
you wrote:
> You're right about null? being a problem. `Nothing` suggests an option
> type. What about 'nada' or 'nix'?
- Re: A value for "nothing", HiPhish, 2018/09/13
- Message not available
- Re: A value for "nothing", HiPhish, 2018/09/14
- Re: A value for "nothing", John Cowan, 2018/09/14
- Re: A value for "nothing",
HiPhish <=
- Re: A value for "nothing", Keith Wright, 2018/09/15
- Re: A value for "nothing", Edwin Watkeys, 2018/09/15
- Re: A value for "nothing", HiPhish, 2018/09/15
- Re: A value for "nothing", Edwin Watkeys, 2018/09/15
- Re: A value for "nothing", HiPhish, 2018/09/15
- Re: A value for "nothing", David Pirotte, 2018/09/15