[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Wikidata] [ANN] nomunofu v0.1.0
From: |
Roel Janssen |
Subject: |
Re: [Wikidata] [ANN] nomunofu v0.1.0 |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Dec 2019 13:34:08 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.34.2 (3.34.2-1.fc31) |
On Mon, 2019-12-23 at 09:56 +0100, address@hidden wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 06:36:06PM -0500, Ted Thibodeau Jr via General Guile
> related discussions wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Hi, Amirouche --
> >
> > Kingsley's points about tuning Virtuoso to use available
> > RAM [1] and other system resources are worth looking into,
> > but a possibly more important first question is --
> >
> > Exactly what version of Virtuoso are you testing?
> >
> > If you followed the common script on Ubuntu 18.04, i.e., --
> >
> > sudo apt update
> >
> > sudo apt install virtuoso-opensource
>
> Hi, Ted
>
> I see you do have a stake in the game. That's fine, since having
> a good technical discussion should be independent of that. So
> thanks for chiming in!
>
> > -- then you likely have version 6.1.6 of VOS, the Open Source
> > Edition of Virtuoso, which shipped 2012-08-02 [2], and is far
> > behind the latest version of both VOS (v7.2.5+) and Enterprise
> > Edition (v8.3+)!
>
> Wouldn't that be something your company could contribute to
> Ubuntu/Debian? Contact the package maintainers and help keeping
> the free version of Virtuoso up to snuff on those platforms?
>
> A rising tide, etc?
>
> > You can also try Enterprise Edition at no cost for 30 days [5].
>
> I think it's somewhat unfair to try to compare a freshly
> done free project with an established commercial one.
>
> > I'll be interested to hear your new results, with a current build,
> > and with proper INI tuning in place.
>
> Why not assist Amirouche on that part? After all, you have
> much easier access to Virtuoso expertise, and me, at least,
> rather prefer Amirouche to spend his time tuning his wonderful
> free creatures than tuning Virtuoso ;-P (of course, he'll end
> up doing what he enjoys most, I'd hope!).
>
This might already help:
I packaged Virtuoso OSE 7.2.5 for GNU Guix. The documentation of Virtuoso OSE
provides enough information to tune it quite well. (I've been running Virtuoso
OSE (from a GNU Guix install) for about three years now, and am quite happy with
its performance).
Cheers,
Roel