guile-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 2 macros in one expression


From: Damien Mattei
Subject: Re: 2 macros in one expression
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 21:36:50 +0200

i test my previous problem both with Racket and Guile, it gave the same
error , i isolated the problem out of SRFI 105 ,so it is not related to
SRFI 105, here is a simple code to test:

(define-syntax $nfx$
  (syntax-rules ()

    ((_ ident opspecial term1 op term2) (cond ((or (equal? (quote
opspecial) (quote <-)) (equal? (quote opspecial) (quote ←)))
      (begin
(display "$nfx$") (newline)
(opspecial ident (op term1 term2)))) ;; {ident <- term1 op term2}

     ((or (equal? (quote op) (quote ->)) (equal? (quote op) (quote →))) (op
term2 (opspecial ident term1))) ;; Warning: argument names of macro do not
reprensent the values contained in this case

     ;;(else (! (quote ident) (quote opspecial) (quote term1) (quote op)
(quote term2)))))
     (else (! ident opspecial term1 op term2))))))





(define-syntax <-

  (syntax-rules ()

    ((_ var expr)

     (begin
       ;;(display "<- : variable set!") (newline)
       (set! var expr)
       var))))

(define i 3)
> ($nfx$ i <- i + 1)
<-: bad syntax in: <-

it works only if i change the last line of $nfx$:

(else (! ident (quote opspecial) term1 op term2))))))

note: ! which is a procedure is not defined in this example

On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 4:49 PM Damien Mattei <damien.mattei@gmail.com>
wrote:

> i have found that the error is related with this :
>
> (define-syntax $nfx$
>   (syntax-rules ()
>
>     ((_ ident opspecial term1 op term2) (cond ((or (equal? (quote
> opspecial) (quote <-)) (equal? (quote opspecial) (quote ←)))
>       (begin
> (display "$nfx$") (newline)
> (opspecial ident (op term1 term2)))) ;; {ident <- term1 op term2}
>
>      ((or (equal? (quote op) (quote ->)) (equal? (quote op) (quote →)))
> (op term2 (opspecial ident term1))) ;; Warning: argument names of macro do
> not reprensent the values contained in this case
>
>      (else (! ident (quote opspecial) term1 op term2))))
>
> this code works:
> scheme@(guile-user)> (define i 2)
> scheme@(guile-user)> {i <- i + 1}
> $nfx$
> 3
>
> but if i change the last line of the else clause by removing the quote of
> opspecial:
> (else (! ident opspecial term1 op term2))))
>
> it will fail:
>
> scheme@(guile-user)> {i <- i + 1}
> While compiling expression:
> Syntax error:
> unknown location: source expression failed to match any pattern in form <-
>
> i understand the problem is with opspecial equal in this example to the
> special form <-  but what i do not understand is why the code is then going
> to the else clause as i know that previously it was on the same example
> evaluating the first clause:
> (begin
> (display "$nfx$") (newline)
> (opspecial ident (op term1 term2)))) ;; {ident <- term1 op term2}
>
> ???
>
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 1:02 PM Damien Mattei <damien.mattei@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> hello,
>>
>> i have 2 macros used in one expression like this:
>> scheme@(guile-user)> (define i 2)
>> scheme@(guile-user)> {i <- i + 1}
>> and i got this error:
>> While compiling expression:
>> Syntax error:
>> unknown location: source expression failed to match any pattern in form <-
>>
>> i use SRFI-105 so :
>>  '{i <- i + 1} expand in:
>> ($nfx$ i <- i + 1)
>>
>> and i'm expecting $nfx$ to be called but none of this happens:
>> scheme@(guile-user)> ($nfx$ i <- i + 1)
>> While compiling expression:
>> Syntax error:
>> unknown location: source expression failed to match any pattern in form <-
>>
>> it seems to be the <- macro and i do not understand why?
>>
>> any idea?
>>
>> macros are defined like this for the beginning:
>> ;; from file assignment.scm
>> (define-syntax <-
>>
>>   (syntax-rules ()
>>     ;;  special form like : (<- ($bracket-apply$ T 3) ($bracket-apply$ T
>> 4))
>>
>>     ;; one dimension array, example: {a[4] <- 7}
>>     ;; $bracket-apply$ is from SRFI 105  bracket-apply is an argument of
>> the macro
>>     ((_ (bracket-apply container index) expr)
>>
>> ....
>>
>> ;; from file scheme-infix.scm
>> (define-syntax $nfx$
>>   (syntax-rules ()
>>
>>     ((_ ident opspecial term1 op term2) (cond ((or (equal? (quote
>> opspecial) (quote <-)) (equal? (quote opspecial) (quote ←)))
>>       (begin
>> (display "$nfx$") (newline)
>> (opspecial ident (op term1 term2)))) ;; {ident <- {term1 op term2}}
>>
>> ...
>>
>>
>> it is in a module like this:
>>
>> (define-module (Scheme+)
>>
>>   #:use-module (growable-vector)
>>   #:use-module (srfi srfi-69) ;; Basic hash tables
>>   #:use-module (srfi srfi-31) ;; rec
>>   #:export ($nfx$ def $bracket-apply$ <- ← -> → <+ ⥆ +> ⥅ declare $ &
>> condx <> ≠ ** <v v> ⇜ ⇝ repeat)
>>   #:replace (do when unless))
>>
>>
>>
>> (include-from-path "def.scm")
>> (include-from-path "array.scm")
>> (include-from-path "set-values-plus.scm")
>> (include-from-path "apply-square-brackets.scm")
>> (include-from-path "assignment.scm")
>> (include-from-path "declare.scm")
>> (include-from-path "condx.scm")
>> (include-from-path "block.scm")
>> (include-from-path "not-equal.scm")
>> (include-from-path "exponential.scm")
>> (include-from-path "while-do-when-unless.scm")
>> (include-from-path "repeat-until.scm")
>> (include-from-path "scheme-infix.scm")
>>
>> if it can help.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Damien
>>
>


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]