[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: error Wrong type to apply: #<syntax-transformer
From: |
Jean Abou Samra |
Subject: |
Re: error Wrong type to apply: #<syntax-transformer |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Aug 2023 01:00:37 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.48.4 (3.48.4-1.fc38) |
Le mardi 08 août 2023 à 21:38 +0200, Maxime Devos a écrit :
> As such, this not working on the top-level seems a bug to me -- after
> all, a module definition is conceptually just a big let:
>
> <enable extra reader syntax> (if applicable)
> (let ()
> <magic to make imports work>
> (define ...)
> (define-syntax-rule ...) ...
> ;; use a new macro using syntax-local-binding
> ;; to extract the syntax transformer (*).
> <insert stuff in hash tables>)
>
> (*) not sure if that precise approach actually works in this context
This is very tempting to believe, and I wish it were true, but it's not true.
At least in Guile, the <insert stuff in hash tables> part doesn't happen
at the end of evaluating the module. Each module variable is created and
inserted while evaluating the define form. Otherwise this would give
an error:
(define a 5)
(define b (module-ref (current-module) 'a))
(display b)
The consequences are not innocent.
A variable is associated to a binding which is a "place" in the terminology
of some other languages, i.e., something you can set!. For toplevel variables,
because you can use module-set!, a module variable is used as the place.
And because module variables are bound to names which are just symbols,
duplicate definitions stomp on each other. Consider this:
(define a 5)
(define (b) a)
(define a 6)
(display (b))
This is valid in Guile and prints 6. The second definition for `a` reuses
the same variable as the first one, effectively acting like a set!.
Contrast this with
(let ()
(define a 5)
(define (b) a)
(define a 6)
(display (b)))
which raises an error due to the duplicate binding.
As https://okmij.org/ftp/Scheme/macros.html#syntax-rule-dark-corner
puts it, "the top level of Scheme is indeed under-specified and treacherous".
Best,
Jean
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- error Wrong type to apply: #<syntax-transformer, Damien Mattei, 2023/08/03
- Re: error Wrong type to apply: #<syntax-transformer, Maxime Devos, 2023/08/08
- Re: error Wrong type to apply: #<syntax-transformer, Damien Mattei, 2023/08/08
- Re: error Wrong type to apply: #<syntax-transformer,
Jean Abou Samra <=
- Re: error Wrong type to apply: #<syntax-transformer, Maxime Devos, 2023/08/09
- Re: error Wrong type to apply: #<syntax-transformer, Maxime Devos, 2023/08/09
- Re: error Wrong type to apply: #<syntax-transformer, Jean Abou Samra, 2023/08/09