[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: building numpy against OpenBLAS.
From: |
Mark H Weaver |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: building numpy against OpenBLAS. |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Jun 2015 13:33:36 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> writes:
>>>> We currently do not have a working OpenBLAS on MIPS, so the attached
>>>> patch selects OpenBLAS as an input only when not on MIPS. Some
>>>> additional configuration happens only unless "atlas" is among the
>>>> inputs.
>>>
>>> If there are no objections I'd like to go ahead and push this patch to
>>> build numpy with OpenBLAS. From the comments I gather that it's not as
>>> controversial a change as I suspected.
>>
>> I think we should go ahead and switch to OpenBLAS on _all_ platforms,
>> not just on MIPS. Were there any objections to that? If not, I'd
>> advocate just doing it.
>
> There may have been a misunderstanding: We can switch to OpenBLAS for
> all platforms _except_ MIPS because OpenBLAS currently does not build on
> MIPS.
I was indeed confused. However, it seems that ATLAS doesn't build on
MIPS either, based on its 'supported-systems' field.
So, I come again to the same conclusion: that we should switch to
OpenBLAS on _all_ platforms, and strip away the ATLAS-handling code in
our python-numpy package. We can work on fixing OpenBLAS to MIPS later.
What do you think?
Thanks!
Mark