[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Checking signatures on source tarballs
|
From: |
Andreas Enge |
|
Subject: |
Re: Checking signatures on source tarballs |
|
Date: |
Wed, 7 Oct 2015 10:29:58 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
This sounds all very good. In practice, the difference would unfortunately be
only slight: Most packages have no signature, mainly the gnu packages do. But
it would be useful for the cases where signatures exist, and show our
commitment to security.
Andreas
- Re: [bug-gsrc] Checking signatures on source tarballs, (continued)
- Re: Checking signatures on source tarballs, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/10/12
- Re: Checking signatures on source tarballs, Alex Vong, 2015/10/10
- Re: Checking signatures on source tarballs, Mark H Weaver, 2015/10/10
- Re: Checking signatures on source tarballs, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/10/11
- Re: Checking signatures on source tarballs, Rastus Vernon, 2015/10/15
- Re: Checking signatures on source tarballs, Mark H Weaver, 2015/10/15
- Re: Checking signatures on source tarballs, Alex Kost, 2015/10/08
- Re: Checking signatures on source tarballs,
Andreas Enge <=
[PATCH 1/4] emacs: Add 'guix-devel-with-definition'., Alex Kost, 2015/10/08