[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: failing packages
From: |
Ricardo Wurmus |
Subject: |
Re: failing packages |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Oct 2015 22:04:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.13; emacs 24.5.1 |
Andreas Enge <address@hidden> writes:
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 12:52:53PM +0200, Pjotr Prins wrote:
>> Anything bioinformatics is not really used on non Intel architectures.
>> It may change later but, yes, defaulting to x86_64 is the quick option
>> for failing packages. I prefer we change them that way.
>
> How about ngs-sdk, which fails on armhf with the slightly surprising error
> message:
> Configuring NGS-SDK package
> checking system type... Linux
> checking machine architecture... armv7l
> configure: error: unsupported architecture 'Linux'
> (and similarly on mips).
>
> Is it okay to take out mips and arm from the supported architectures?
NGS-SDK has a custom build system with custom checks. I don’t know on
what architectures it is supposed to run. Building it on x86_64 was
quite hard because I had to go around the many invalid assumptions.
It’s a bioinfo library, so I don’t think MIPS (or ARM) is officially
supported, but personally I would like to resist the urge to declare all
bioinfo tools unsupported on non-Intel. (Unfortunately, I don’t have
time to check if NGS-SDK could be build on other platforms at the
moment.)
~~ Ricardo
- Re: failing packages, (continued)
Re: failing packages, Andreas Enge, 2015/10/16
- Re: failing packages, Andreas Enge, 2015/10/16
- Re: failing packages, Pjotr Prins, 2015/10/17
- Re: failing packages, Andreas Enge, 2015/10/17
- Re: failing packages,
Ricardo Wurmus <=
- Re: failing packages, Andreas Enge, 2015/10/17
- Re: failing packages, Ricardo Wurmus, 2015/10/18
Re: failing packages, Andreas Enge, 2015/10/17
Re: failing packages, Andreas Enge, 2015/10/17
Re: failing packages, Efraim Flashner, 2015/10/17
Re: failing packages, Federico Beffa, 2015/10/17