Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add ghc-unix-time.

[Eric Bavier]

On 2015-10-22 10:43, Paul van der Walt wrote:
> On 2015-10-22 at 10:47, quoth address@hidden:
> > > +       #:phases
> > > +       (alist-cons-before
> > > +        'configure 'fix-/bin/sh
> > > +        (lambda _
> > > +          ;; Use `sh', not `/bin/sh'.
> > > +          (substitute* (find-files "." "Makefile|configure")
> > > +            (("/bin/sh")
> > > +             "sh")))
> > > +        %standard-phases)))
> >
> > See the ghc-x11 package for a, IMHO, more elegant solution.
>
> Ah!  Indeed.
>
> > This appears to be a more general issue however.  Any package that 
> > declares in
> > its *.cabal file "build-type: Configure" is going to need CONFIG_SHELL 
> > and/or
> > SHELL in the environment.  See additionally the proposed ghc-sdl,
> > ghc-sdl-image, ghc-sdl-mixer, and ghc-old-time patches.
> >
> > Perhaps we could patch haskell-build-system to export appropriate 
> > CONFIG_SHELL
> > and SHELL variables if it sees a "configure" file in the top-level 
> > source
> > directory.  WDYT?  Would you like to send a patch?
>
> Right, i see what you mean.  I agree that it'd probably be the right
> thing to do.  However, to expedite the merge of wip-haskell-… i propose
> that i take the solution of ghc-x11 and apply it to the relevant
> packages, and then look at fixing the haskell-build-system.  At that
> point we can simply remove the phases introduced to work around this
> deficiency.

OK.

> Do you think that's acceptable, or is it imperative* that we first 
> solve
> the problem in the build system?

An incremental approach seems reasonable to me in this case, since there 
are not so many affected packages at this point.

--
`~Eric