Re: Create address@hidden

[Ludovic Courtès]

Mathieu Lirzin <address@hidden> skribis:

> Florian Paul Schmidt <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> On 21.12.2015 17:21, Eric Bavier wrote:
>>>>> Should we create a address@hidden mailing list specifically
>>>>> to answer user questions?
>>>> 
>>>> Consistent naming schemes are important. I object. How about
>>>> 
>>>> address@hidden
>>> 
>>> I would agree with this, but we already have address@hidden
>>> 
>>> Ludo, are email list names in any GNU guidelines?
>
> I don't think there is a guideline, but there is tradition (sometimes
> not followed) of conventional names for GNU mailing lists, which are:
>
>   address@hidden  address@hidden  address@hidden  address@hidden

Yes, this is all described in the GNU maintainers guide:

  http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/Standard-Mailing-Lists.html

In fact, Savannah enforces/encourages that convention for GNU packages.

My initial question was more about whether it would make sense to create
such a list, rather than how to call it.  Sorry for being unclear!

Ludo’.