[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Build failure on armhf
|
From: |
Andi Kleen |
|
Subject: |
Re: Build failure on armhf |
|
Date: |
Wed, 30 Dec 2015 20:45:04 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
> What is the problem you are trying to solve?
I guess he wants to build on that platform.
Adding the numbers to syscall.c is also only needed if the necessary
syscall numbers are missing in asm/unistd.h. It really was originally
only for ancient distributions where the headers predate numa support.
So updating that may also help.
If your headers don't have numa support at all it may be also possible
that the platform simply doesn't support NUMA. In that case building
numactl is pointless.
-Andi