[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Version numbers for VCS snapshots
From: |
Ricardo Wurmus |
Subject: |
Re: Version numbers for VCS snapshots |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Jan 2016 13:31:48 +0100 |
Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:
> On Thu 21 Jan 2016 22:25, address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> +2.0.11-3.deadbeef
>
> I thought you were vegetarian :) 2.0.11-3.cabba9e has 7 digits.
>
> Andy, clearly providing very key and crucial feedback
This vegetarian approves of this crucial change :)
~~ Ricardo
- Re: Version numbers for VCS snapshots, (continued)
- Re: Version numbers for VCS snapshots, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/01/21
- Re: Version numbers for VCS snapshots, Ricardo Wurmus, 2016/01/21
- Re: Version numbers for VCS snapshots, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/01/21
- Re: Version numbers for VCS snapshots, Ricardo Wurmus, 2016/01/21
- Re: Version numbers for VCS snapshots, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/01/23
- Re: Version numbers for VCS snapshots, Ricardo Wurmus, 2016/01/23
- Re: Version numbers for VCS snapshots, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/01/24
- Re: Version numbers for VCS snapshots, Eric Bavier, 2016/01/21
- Re: Version numbers for VCS snapshots, Jookia, 2016/01/21
- Re: Version numbers for VCS snapshots, Andy Wingo, 2016/01/22
- Re: Version numbers for VCS snapshots,
Ricardo Wurmus <=
- Re: Version numbers for VCS snapshots, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/01/23
Re: New CLI syntax for package version, Federico Beffa, 2016/01/09