[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc
From: |
Ricardo Wurmus |
Subject: |
Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc |
Date: |
Sun, 14 Aug 2016 09:46:33 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.16; emacs 25.1.1 |
David Craven <address@hidden> writes:
>> But where does the disambiguation choice to expat come from ?
>
> I'm no expert, but I think that the difference is only in that the x11
> license has an amendment.
Correct. I looked at the actual license in the COPYRIGHT file and it
looked like Expat, not like X11. (In Guix we don’t use the name “MIT”,
because it is ambiguous.) I added a comment to point at the COPYRIGHT
file for details of the third-party pieces under non-copyleft licenses.
~~ Ricardo
- Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc, (continued)
Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc, David Craven, 2016/08/03
- Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc, Ricardo Wurmus, 2016/08/12
- Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc, Ricardo Wurmus, 2016/08/13
- Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc, Vincent Legoll, 2016/08/13
- Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc, David Craven, 2016/08/13
- Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc, Vincent Legoll, 2016/08/13
- Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc, David Craven, 2016/08/13
- Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc,
Ricardo Wurmus <=
Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc, David Craven, 2016/08/08