[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs.
From: |
ng0 |
Subject: |
Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs. |
Date: |
Fri, 02 Sep 2016 00:58:30 +0000 |
John Darrington <address@hidden> writes:
> [ Unknown signature status ]
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:19:00AM +0000, ng0 wrote:
>
> I begin to suspect that what I want has not been written, like in
> several other cases I ran into in the last years.
What I meant here, and before that, will get too offtopic at the
moment. Eventually I will have an article translated which I can
reference in a text. (For those fluent in those two languages, this is
what I mean: http://my.pages.de/convivenza.it ,
http://my.pages.de/convivenza.de )
In this case "has not been written": I'm thinking about a completely
distributed version control system, serverless, but there are issues I
do not understand at the moment and can not put my full attention
to. I have some ideas outlined, and some annoyances every system I used
so far had (namechanges for examples). This is also why I am packaging
darcs to look at pijul and so on.
> I suspect it is more a case of not being able to agree on one.
>
> I have found, in the past, that aegis is a great tool for managing the kind of
> work we do. Amongst other things, code review and tests are built into the
> design - and not tagged on as an afterthought. And it is designed to ensure
> an "always works" policy. A real "continuous integration" tool, which is a
> term which is banded about so much these days, but rarely actually done.
>
>
> Unfortunately, aegis is difficult to introduce to a project - not for
> technical
> reasons - but social ones. My attempts have often resulted in people
> complaining
> that the thing is "defective" because it won't allow them to do what they
> want (ie commit
> without review/build/test).
>
> J'
This sounds interesting. Is there a demo instance somewhere?
> --
> Avoid eavesdropping. Send strong encryted email.
> PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
> fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
> See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.
>
--
ng0
For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org
- Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs., ng0, 2016/09/01
- Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs., ng0, 2016/09/01
- Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs., John Darrington, 2016/09/01
- Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs.,
ng0 <=
- Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs., Alex Vong, 2016/09/02
- Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs., ng0, 2016/09/02
- Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs., Alex Vong, 2016/09/02
- Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs., Pjotr Prins, 2016/09/03
- Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs., David Craven, 2016/09/03
- Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs., Brendan Tildesley, 2016/09/03
- Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs., David Craven, 2016/09/03
- Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs., Efraim Flashner, 2016/09/03
- Tracking package submissions with Debbugs, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/09/02
- Re: Tracking package submissions with Debbugs, Ricardo Wurmus, 2016/09/02
- Prev by Date:
Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs.
- Next by Date:
Re: [PATCH 1/2] daemon: Fix '--version'.
- Previous by thread:
Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs.
- Next by thread:
Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs.
- Index(es):