[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ghc 8
From: |
ng0 |
Subject: |
Re: ghc 8 |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Sep 2016 10:21:18 +0000 |
Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:
> ng0 <address@hidden> skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> ng0 <address@hidden> skribis:
>>>
>>>> should we package ghc 8 in core-updates? It was released in May:
>>>> https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/blog/ghc-8.0.1-released
>>>
>>> Probably a good idea. :-)
>>>
>>> This can be done in ‘master’, or, if we change to default GHC, to a
>>> dedicated ‘ghc-update’ branch.
>>>
>>> Ludo’.
>>
>> Should this replace current ghc? I don't know how much of our current
>> (gnu packages haskell) would break.
>
> No idea. I suppose we take this route:
>
> 1. First you test a sample of ghc-* packages and build them to see if
> there’s obvious breakage.
>
> 2. If not, we commit the GHC upgrade in a branch and let Hydra build
> the branch.
>
> 3. We fix package breaks that we notice on the branch.
>
> 4. Merge the branch.
>
> How does that sound?
>
> Ludo’.
Sounds good to me.
--
ng0
For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org