Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: openjpeg-2.*: Fix CVE-2016-7163.

[Efraim Flashner]

On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 02:04:40AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> * gnu/packages/patches/openjpeg-CVE-2016-7163.patch: New file.
> * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it.
> * gnu/packages/image.scm (openjpeg, openjpeg-2.0): Use it.
> ---
>  gnu/local.mk                                      |  1 +
>  gnu/packages/image.scm                            |  6 +-
>  gnu/packages/patches/openjpeg-CVE-2016-7163.patch | 71 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 gnu/packages/patches/openjpeg-CVE-2016-7163.patch
> 
> diff --git a/gnu/local.mk b/gnu/local.mk
> index 8b042d5..668c9b2 100644
> --- a/gnu/local.mk
> +++ b/gnu/local.mk
> @@ -702,6 +702,7 @@ dist_patch_DATA =                                         
> \
>    %D%/packages/patches/ocaml-findlib-make-install.patch      \
>    %D%/packages/patches/openexr-missing-samples.patch         \
>    %D%/packages/patches/openjpeg-CVE-2015-6581.patch          \
> +  %D%/packages/patches/openjpeg-CVE-2016-7163.patch          \
>    %D%/packages/patches/openjpeg-use-after-free-fix.patch     \
>    %D%/packages/patches/openssl-runpath.patch                 \
>    %D%/packages/patches/openssl-1.1.0-c-rehash-in.patch               \
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/image.scm b/gnu/packages/image.scm
> index a65bf39..64bc05d 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/image.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/image.scm
> @@ -387,7 +387,8 @@ work.")
>          (sha256
>           (base32 "00zzm303zvv4ijzancrsb1cqbph3pgz0nky92k9qx3fq9y0vnchj"))
>          (patches (search-patches "openjpeg-use-after-free-fix.patch"
> -                                 "openjpeg-CVE-2015-6581.patch"))))
> +                                 "openjpeg-CVE-2015-6581.patch"
> +                                 "openjpeg-CVE-2016-7163.patch"))))
>      (build-system cmake-build-system)
>      (arguments
>        ;; Trying to run `$ make check' results in a no rule fault.
> @@ -424,7 +425,8 @@ error-resilience, a Java-viewer for j2k-images, ...")
>         (sha256
>          (base32 "1c2xc3nl2mg511b63rk7hrckmy14681p1m44mzw3n1fyqnjm0b0z"))
>         (patches (search-patches "openjpeg-use-after-free-fix.patch"
> -                                "openjpeg-CVE-2015-6581.patch"))))))
> +                                "openjpeg-CVE-2015-6581.patch"
> +                                "openjpeg-CVE-2016-7163.patch"))))))
>  
>  (define-public openjpeg-1
>    (package (inherit openjpeg)
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/openjpeg-CVE-2016-7163.patch 
> b/gnu/packages/patches/openjpeg-CVE-2016-7163.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..68cf7b9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gnu/packages/patches/openjpeg-CVE-2016-7163.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
> +Fix CVE-2016-7613 (Integer overflow in opj_pi_create_decode allowing 
> execution
> +of arbitrary code):
> +
> +https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-7163
> +https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/issues/826
> +http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q3/442
> +
> +Copied from upstream repository:
> +
> +https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/commit/c16bc057ba3f125051c9966cf1f5b68a05681de4
> +https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/commit/ef01f18dfc6780b776d0674ed3e7415c6ef54d24
> +
> +From ef01f18dfc6780b776d0674ed3e7415c6ef54d24 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> +From: Matthieu Darbois <address@hidden>
> +Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 07:34:46 +0200
> +Subject: [PATCH] Cast to size_t before multiplication
> +
> +Prevent an integer overflow issue in function opj_pi_create_decode of
> +pi.c.
> +---
> + src/lib/openjp2/pi.c | 8 +++++++-
> + 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> +
> +diff --git a/src/lib/openjp2/pi.c b/src/lib/openjp2/pi.c
> +index cffad66..36e2ff0 100644
> +--- a/src/lib/openjp2/pi.c
> ++++ b/src/lib/openjp2/pi.c
> +@@ -1237,7 +1237,13 @@ opj_pi_iterator_t *opj_pi_create_decode(opj_image_t 
> *p_image,
> +     l_current_pi = l_pi;
> + 
> +     /* memory allocation for include */
> +-    l_current_pi->include = (OPJ_INT16*) opj_calloc((l_tcp->numlayers +1) * 
> l_step_l, sizeof(OPJ_INT16));
> ++    /* prevent an integer overflow issue */
> ++    l_current_pi->include = 00;
> ++    if (l_step_l <= (SIZE_MAX / (l_tcp->numlayers + 1U)))
> ++    {
> ++            l_current_pi->include = (OPJ_INT16*) 
> opj_calloc((l_tcp->numlayers +1) * l_step_l, sizeof(OPJ_INT16));
> ++    }
> ++
> +     if
> +             (!l_current_pi->include)
> +     {
> +-- 
> +2.10.0
> +
> +Need to cast to size_t before multiplication otherwise overflow check is 
> useless.
> +---
> + src/lib/openjp2/pi.c | 2 +-
> + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> +
> +diff --git a/src/lib/openjp2/pi.c b/src/lib/openjp2/pi.c
> +index 36e2ff0..809b33d 100644
> +--- a/src/lib/openjp2/pi.c
> ++++ b/src/lib/openjp2/pi.c
> +@@ -1241,7 +1241,7 @@ opj_pi_iterator_t *opj_pi_create_decode(opj_image_t 
> *p_image,
> +     l_current_pi->include = 00;
> +     if (l_step_l <= (SIZE_MAX / (l_tcp->numlayers + 1U)))
> +     {
> +-            l_current_pi->include = (OPJ_INT16*) 
> opj_calloc((l_tcp->numlayers +1) * l_step_l, sizeof(OPJ_INT16));
> ++            l_current_pi->include = (OPJ_INT16*) 
> opj_calloc((size_t)(l_tcp->numlayers + 1U) * l_step_l, sizeof(OPJ_INT16));
> +     }
> + 
> +     if
> +-- 
> +2.10.0
> +

Was from here down put/left here intentionally? It looks out of place

> +From c16bc057ba3f125051c9966cf1f5b68a05681de4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> +From: trylab <address@hidden>
> +Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 13:55:49 +0800
> +Subject: [PATCH] Fix an integer overflow issue (#809)
> +
> -- 
> 2.10.0
> 
> 

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <address@hidden>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature