|
From: | Kei Kebreau |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add qscintilla. |
Date: | Thu, 15 Sep 2016 10:20:00 -0400 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Efraim Flashner <address@hidden> writes: > On September 14, 2016 11:37:46 PM GMT+03:00, Kei Kebreau > <address@hidden> wrote: >>Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes: >> >>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 02:11:44PM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote: >>>> Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes: >>>> >>>> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 08:48:43PM +0000, Efraim Flashner wrote: >>>> >> On September 13, 2016 11:37:35 PM GMT+03:00, Kei Kebreau >>>> >> <address@hidden> wrote: >>>> >> >In this case, should I leave qtscintilla-qt4 as a public package >>in >>>> >> >qt.scm >>>> >> >instead of maths.scm as Leo suggested? >>>> >> >>>> >> That's where I would leave it. You could also leave a note, >>saying >>>> >> that it was for octave, and if they switch to qt5 then we can get >>rid >>>> >> of it. We still have an old vte package I added for a terminal >>since >>>> >> all the bug reports around it haven't been cleared yet, and >>that's >>>> >> with the other versions of vte. -- >>>> > >>>> > Sounds like a plan! >>>> >>>> Alright then! I have all three patches here. Tell me if I did >>anything >>>> funny. The order of application is "Add qscintilla, Add >>qscintilla-qt4, >>>> Enable Octave's Qt 4 GUI." :) >>> >>> The patches "Add qscintilla" and "Add qscintilla-qt4" both add both >>> packages. >> >>Fixed it. > > If you switch ("qtbase" ,qtbase) to ("qt" ,qtbase) can you remove the > whole argument block from qscintilla? I can! Nice catch.
0001-gnu-Add-qscintilla.patch
Description: Text document
0001-gnu-Add-qscintilla-qt4.patch
Description: Text document
0001-gnu-octave-Enable-Octave-s-Qt-4-GUI.patch
Description: Text document
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |