[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH]: opensmtpd, opensmtpd-extras, libasr.
From: |
ng0 |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH]: opensmtpd, opensmtpd-extras, libasr. |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Sep 2016 08:35:50 +0000 |
Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:
> [ Unknown signature status ]
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 09:43:29PM +0000, ng0 wrote:
>> I commented mariadb + postgresql for now. I want some feedback first if
>> you think we should provide it this way, or if we should add both to
>> different outputs.
>> It would not make much difference in the size of the dependency graph
>> unless one creates a opensmtpd-extras-postgresql package for example
>> which just builds the postgresql related things.
>
> Is it even possible to split the package up like that? I don't think
> it's necessary anyways. I think we should pick a database (I'd choose
> postgresql) and add the package. If somebody wants to use mariadb, we
> can add it when they request it.
Okay, I agree. Can the committer makes the change locally, or should I
send in new versions?
--
ng0
- [PATCH]: opensmtpd, opensmtpd-extras, libasr., ng0, 2016/09/08
- Re: [PATCH]: opensmtpd, opensmtpd-extras, libasr., Marius Bakke, 2016/09/08
- Re: [PATCH]: opensmtpd, opensmtpd-extras, libasr., Efraim Flashner, 2016/09/08
- Re: [PATCH]: opensmtpd, opensmtpd-extras, libasr., Eric Bavier, 2016/09/09
- Re: [PATCH]: opensmtpd, opensmtpd-extras, libasr., ng0, 2016/09/09
- Re: [PATCH]: opensmtpd, opensmtpd-extras, libasr., ng0, 2016/09/19
- Re: [PATCH]: opensmtpd, opensmtpd-extras, libasr., Leo Famulari, 2016/09/20
- Re: [PATCH]: opensmtpd, opensmtpd-extras, libasr.,
ng0 <=