Re: Add murmur.

[ng0]

On 17-02-10 22:54:21, Marius Bakke wrote:
> ng0 <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > On 17-02-09 23:50:02, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> >> ng0 <address@hidden> skribis:
> >> 
> >> > On 17-02-09 17:50:04, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> >> >> Hi ng0!
> >> >> 
> >> >> address@hidden skribis:
> >> >> 
> >> >> > This patch adds an proposed change to mumble, murmur as an output.
> >> >> 
> >> >> I’m reluctant to “non-standard” outputs like this.  The reason for
> >> >> multiple outputs should be to reduce the closure size for standards
> >> >> uses.  What do we gain by not included murmurd in “out” in this case?
> >> >> 
> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> Ludo’.
> >> >
> >> > We remove the server component (murmurd) from the client component
> >> > (mumble).  I imagine that if you run murmurd, you will not want mumble
> >> > in the same user profile.  And if you run mumble, you probably don't
> >> > want murmurd.  The default is a client, adding murmur output is logical.
> >> > But this is just my view.. I would not want a server unless I explicitly
> >> > expressed my intention to have it
> >> >
> >> > What do you think?
> >> 
> >> I think the only reason to separate things usually is size, not
> >> “aesthetics.”  So I’d be in favor of keeping both in the same output if
> >> there’s no size problem.
> >>
> >
> > Of course this is a theoretic issue, but the separation of server+client
> > where applicable when the nature of an application allows it makes sense
> > to me.
> 
> What does `guix size` say about mumble:murmur compared to mumble:out? If
> the server does not depend on any graphical features, I think a separate
> output makes sense. mumble alone is ~1GiB.

As far as I know right now, it does not have any graphical features or
dependencies.

mumble:murmur -> total: 1072.6 MiB
mumble:out    -> total: 1111.2 MiB

So there is a size difference which would justify this output in my
(currently very sleepy and jet-lagged) opinion.

-- 
ng0 -- https://www.inventati.org/patternsinthechaos/