guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-openid.


From: ng0
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-openid.
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 16:53:40 +0000

On 17-02-14 15:55:11, ng0 wrote:
> On 17-02-14 16:23:13, Marius Bakke wrote:
> > Julien Lepiller <address@hidden> writes:
> > 
> > > * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-openid): New variable.
> > 
> > [...]
> >   
> > > +(define-public python-openid
> > > +  (package
> > > +    (name "python-openid")
> > > +    (version "3.0.10")
> > > +    (source
> > > +     (origin
> > > +       (method url-fetch)
> > > +       (uri (pypi-uri "python3-openid" version))
> > > +       (sha256
> > > +        (base32
> > > +         "1x3nh3fycqfn43jp5j5pb4q4y2jxp4mdka4absaa3bc0078qd758"))))
> > > +    (build-system python-build-system)
> > > +    (home-page "https://github.com/necaris/python3-openid";)
> > > +    (synopsis "OpenID support for servers and consumers")
> > > +    (description "This library provides OpenID authentication for 
> > > Python, both
> > > +for clients and servers.")
> > > +    (license license:asl2.0)))
> > 
> > Hi Julien,
> > 
> > This package has a runtime dependency on 'defusedxml' according to the
> > setup.py file. It is currently silently failing its tests due to this,
> > and a bug in python-build-system[0].
> > 
> > Could you look into packaging it and using it for this package?
> > 
> > [0] https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25177
> 
> Hi,
> 
> as far as I know I packaged defusedxml. Either someone forgot to review
> this or you should look at the last email I've sent about packages which
> need to be reviewed.

As you can see here 
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=defusedxml&submit=Search!&idxname=guix-devel&max=20&result=normal&sort=score
they have not been pushed (as part of postorius) because Harmut had a
question, django packaging related, which so far remained open:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-02/msg00072.html

It would be great if either Harmut would just go ahead and push them -
discussion can be done afterwards and package process be fixed and
documented then - or if the questions are replied to.


> Thanks.
> -- 
> ng0 -- https://www.inventati.org/patternsinthechaos/
> 

-- 
ng0 -- https://www.inventati.org/patternsinthechaos/



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]