Re: Why is "append" the activation service's "compose" procedure?

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hello Chris,

Chris Marusich <address@hidden> skribis:

> By the way, I noticed that the cups-service-type also uses "append" as
> its "compose" procedure.  I think this is suspicious.  The comment in
> the code says:
>
>     ;; Extensions consist of lists of packages (representing CUPS
>     ;; drivers, etc) that we just concatenate.
>     (compose append)

According to the comment, it should be ‘concatenate’ instead of
‘append’.

But like you write, it’s plausible that nobody tried to extend
‘cups-service-type’ so far, which is why we didn’t have any problems.

I think you can go ahead and make this change.

Thanks,
Ludo’.