Re: fuse & sshfs

[Efraim Flashner]

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 09:31:20PM -0500, Brett Gilio wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> With 1.0 around the corner, is there any priority for packages like
> fuse? The latest release is 3.5 and we are using 2.9.
> 
> All of these packages depend on it
> address@hidden address@hidden address@hidden address@hidden
> address@hidden address@hidden address@hidden
> address@hidden address@hidden address@hidden address@hidden address@hidden
> address@hidden address@hidden address@hidden address@hidden address@hidden
> address@hidden address@hidden address@hidden address@hidden
> address@hidden address@hidden address@hidden address@hidden
> address@hidden address@hidden address@hidden address@hidden
> address@hidden
> 
> Is it maybe lingering in one of our unmerged branches out there? If not,
> I wouldn't mind trying to take a crack at bumping it. I know for a fact
> that not updating it limits out ability to upgrade sshfs since it
> depends on version >3.
> 
> Best
> 
> Brett Gilio
> 

I looked into bumping it a while ago and I ended up down a rabbit hole I
didn't really want to venture into. Don't really remember much beyond
that unfortunately.

I looked into bumping it a while ago and I ended up down a rabbit hole I
didn't really want to venture into. Don't really remember much beyond
that unfortunately.

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <address@hidden>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature