[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fc-cache -f --> fc-cache -fv in the manual
From: |
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice |
Subject: |
Re: fc-cache -f --> fc-cache -fv in the manual |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Sep 2019 19:00:41 +0200 |
Joshua,
Joshua Branson 写道:
This is a tiny documentation fix. When I was having trouble a
few
days ago getting Icecat to display my fonts, I checked the
manual and
ran the command "fc-cache -f". It did successfully run, but I
did not
see any indication that it did anything. So I ran it
repeatedly.
Such is the Unix way. You're supposed to feel the 0 in the air,
or something.
Perhaps we should add the verbose option. This will signal to
users
that the command is updating the font cache.
I also went ahead and changed command in the translated manuals
as well.
While that probably works, we don't usually do this and it
significantly bloats the diff. Don't bother.
Otherwise (and with a commit message) fine by me! This will also
warn about problematic things like
/var/cache/fontconfig: not cleaning unwritable cache directory
although they will be so buried in the output that nobody will see
'em.
Does you/anyone know if it would be useful to recommend ‘-rv’
instead of ‘-fv’? I always use ‘-r’: where ‘-f’ rewrites
all cache files whether or not they are considered out of date,
‘-r’ also deletes them first, for good measure. I don't know
whether it makes a difference in the real world.
Kind regards,
T G-R
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature