guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fixing ant-bootstrap / jamvm segfault (i686)


From: Gábor Boskovits
Subject: Re: Fixing ant-bootstrap / jamvm segfault (i686)
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 23:14:13 +0200

Hello,

Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> ezt írta (időpont: 2019. szept. 27., P, 9:52):

Gábor Boskovits <address@hidden> writes:

> Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> ezt írta (időpont: 2019. szept. 27.,
> Pén 9:14):
>
>>
>> Hi Gábor,
>>
>> > Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> ezt írta (időpont: 2019. szept. 16.,
>> > Hét 15:20):
>> >
>> >> Hi Guix,
>> >>
>> >> here’s a probably needlessly complicated patch to fix the build of
>> >> ant-bootstrap.  It currently fails to build because jamvm
>> >> segfaults.
>>
>> […]
>>
>> >> I’m almost certain that not all of these configure flags are needed.
>> >> What do you think?  Would someone like to play a little with this patch
>> >> and see if we can figure out why exactly jamvm segfaults?
>> >>
>> > I will try to have a look at this again in the coming days.
>> >
>> >>
>> >> I used this command to build ant-bootstrap:
>> >>
>> >>     ./pre-inst-env guix build -K --system=i686-linux -e '(@@ (gnu
>> packages
>> >> java) ant-bootstrap)'
>>
>> Have you been able to take a look at this?  I’d like to push this or a
>> variant
>> of it to the core-updates branch soon.
>>
> Not yet. I will have a look tomorrow and report back if that is not too
> late.

Tomorrow would be just fine.  There’s no real rush, but I’d like to
avoid forgetting about this when we already have the means to fix lots
of broken packages on core-updates.

Thanks for taking a look at this!

--
Ricardo


So far I can confirm that the patch as is works fine for me. I will now have a look at reducing this.

--
OpenPGP Key Fingerprint: 7988:3B9F:7D6A:4DBF:3719:0367:2506:A96C:CF63:0B21

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]