Re: Question about sbcl-package->ecl-package

[Efraim Flashner]

On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 01:59:01PM +0200, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> I've encountered the same problem a couple of times.
> If you try to compile ecl-dexador, you'll see it fails because it does
> not re-use the arguments of sbcl-dexador which patches out a failing
> test.
> 
> Something is wrong in sbcl-package->ecl-package.
> Andy?
> 
> That said, it's not a very big deal, since the cl- package works for all 
> compilers.
> 

Sounds like the conversion isn't "recursive enough". On a per-package
basis you can replace the created ecl package with the real one. The
better option would be to look at how python defines python2- variants,
which sounds a lot like the problem you're having here.


-- 
Efraim Flashner   <address@hidden>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature