[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Document GUIX_LOAD_PATH?
From: |
Pierre Neidhardt |
Subject: |
Re: Document GUIX_LOAD_PATH? |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Dec 2019 18:04:13 +0100 |
The reason this came up was because the --load-path command line
argument was missing from some command. Then Clément argued that it was
not necessary anyways, we could set GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH (I didn't know
that it was effectively the same as --load-path, but for all commands).
So the question is: shall we add --load-path to all commands instead?
(If not already the case.)
Side question: Can we really do everything without using GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH?
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Document GUIX_LOAD_PATH?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2019/12/18
- Re: Document GUIX_LOAD_PATH?, zimoun, 2019/12/18
- Re: Document GUIX_LOAD_PATH?, Clément Lassieur, 2019/12/19
- Re: Document GUIX_LOAD_PATH?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2019/12/19
- Re: Document GUIX_LOAD_PATH?, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/12/19
- Re: Document GUIX_LOAD_PATH?,
Pierre Neidhardt <=
- Re: Document GUIX_LOAD_PATH?, zimoun, 2019/12/19
- Re: Document GUIX_LOAD_PATH?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2019/12/19
- Command line option in addition to GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH - Reason?, Danny Milosavljevic, 2019/12/26
- Re: Command line option in addition to GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH - Reason?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2019/12/28
- Re: Command line option in addition to GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH - Reason?, zimoun, 2019/12/30
- Re: Document GUIX_LOAD_PATH?, zimoun, 2019/12/19