[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: merge wip-haskell?
From: |
Ricardo Wurmus |
Subject: |
Re: merge wip-haskell? |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Aug 2020 19:54:32 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.4.10; emacs 26.3 |
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> skribis:
>
>> Yes, and for the case of pandoc it’s significant. The closure of
>> ghc-pandoc is >3GiB right now and with the changes it’s <200MiB. This
>> affects lots of R packages that need Rmarkdown, and lots of bioinfo
>> packages.
>
> Are those changes part of what was merged? I get:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> $ guix describe
> Generacio 153 Aug 24 2020 10:53:47 (nuna)
> guix c687299
> repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
> branch: master
> commit: c6872990b51971922f3064cba54ab752fcdc1559
> $ guix size ghc-pandoc | tail -1
> total: 2033.0 MiB
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> Or am I missing something?
Try the “pandoc” package instead. There are now two packages:
“ghc-pandoc” for the regular old shared library thing and “pandoc” for
this static linking abomination.
(Similarly for “ghc-pandoc-citeproc” and “pandoc-citeproc”.)
I should note that it doesn’t help with one case I had in mind: “guix
pack” still includes way too much, unfortunately, so there is no impact
on application bundle size yet.
--
Ricardo
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, (continued)
Re: merge wip-haskell?, Jakub Kądziołka, 2020/08/07
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, John Soo, 2020/08/07
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, Jakub Kądziołka, 2020/08/07
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/08/07
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, John Soo, 2020/08/07
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/08/24
- Re: merge wip-haskell?,
Ricardo Wurmus <=
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/08/28
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, John Soo, 2020/08/28
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, Timothy Sample, 2020/08/28
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, Timothy Sample, 2020/08/29
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, John Soo, 2020/08/29
Re: merge wip-haskell?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/08/07