[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Staging branch [substitute availability]
From: |
Efraim Flashner |
Subject: |
Re: Staging branch [substitute availability] |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Jan 2021 20:25:57 +0200 |
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 06:51:13PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 03:46:45PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> > ------
> > master branch
> > aarch64: 72%
> > x86_64: 94%
> > i686: 86%
> > armhf: 46%
> >
> > staging branch
> > aarch64: 48%
> > x86_64: 79%
> > i686: 70%
> > armhf: 30%
> > ------
>
> Updates since the recent merge of master into staging:
>
> ------
> master branch
> aarch64: 72%
> x86_64: 94%
> i686: 86%
> armhf: 46%
>
> staging branch
> aarch64: 51%
> x86_64: 73%
> i686: 69%
> armhf: 27%
> ------
>
> So, minor improvements to aarch64, but x86_64 is actually worse!
> Mathieu, I'm curious, are we using the overdrives again? Or still
> emulating aarch64?
>
> `guix weather` said to me that there are *no* queued builds for x86_64
> on staging, but ci.guix.gnu.org web interface shows that there are
> queued builds.
>
> kwayland is definitely broken on x86_64, so wayland users are invited to
> fix it:
>
This is probably me, I was able to enable and run the kwayland tests on
my machine but I think this test only fails when the machine is under
load.
> ------
> The following tests FAILED:
> 26 - kwayland-testPlasmaWindowModel (Failed)
> Errors while running CTest
> make: *** [Makefile:112: test] Error 8
> ------
>
> I've attached the full reports.
>
> My plan is to wait for feedback for a few days and, if I don't hear
> otherwise, then merge the staging branch into master and push.
Sounds good!
--
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Staging branch [problem with node-10.22], (continued)
Re: Staging branch [substitute availability], Ekaitz Zarraga, 2021/01/24
Re: Staging branch [substitute availability], Leo Famulari, 2021/01/26
Re: Staging branch [substitute availability],
Efraim Flashner <=